FluMist... Know The Risks!

Return To HOME Page

Given this is a fairly new product, I wanted to provide for readers a few comments from those who have studied issues surrounding FluMist...

Particularly interesting are these articles (Dr. Sherri Tenpenny) outlining the risks, politics, and financial implications of this new vaccine - for both the vaccinated and the unvaccinated!  

http://proliberty.com/observer/20031203.htm

http://www.redflagsweekly.com/conferences/vaccines/oct03_Tenpenny.html

http://www.mercola.com/2003/oct/4/flumist_vaccine.htm

Tips for combating the flu:  http://www.nmaseminars.com/

Note also what the CDC website states regarding this product - I quote:

"Updated: March 01, 2005
Is influenza vaccine that does not contain thimerosal as a preservative available this flu season (2004-2005)?
For the 2004-2005 flu season, a limited amount of influenza vaccine that does not contain thimerosal as a preservative is available. A preservative-free influenza vaccine made by Aventis Pasteur is approved for use in children 6-35 months of age. When making preservative-free flu vaccine, the manufacturer uses thimerosal early in the manufacturing process. However, the thimerosal gets diluted as the vaccine goes through steps in the production process and only trace amounts remain in the final product. Also, the nasal-spray influenza vaccine (sold commercially as FluMist®) does not contain any thimerosal and can be given to healthy people 5 to 49 years of age who are not pregnant.". [end of quote, http://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/qa/thimerosal.htm]

So...this product does not contain mercury (and as such, you would think it would be the safest one out there)... yet it should not be given to those under 5 or those over 49, not to pregnant women and only to "the healthy"...  hum... am I just the only one who sees something very "odd" here... all you "other folks"... infants, pregnant women, the elderly, the sick... guess you can just line up for that toxic mercury laced shot... that "regular flu shot"... Incompetence at the CDC, in my opinion, is alive and well and to me... this certainly speaks VOLUMES as far as the "safety" of this new nasal spray product.   

For a whole lot more on whether or not the influenza vaccine is even "effective" and the myth that "vaccines save lives"... take a look at this very revealing article:  http://www.vaccination.inoz.com/vacprotect2.html.  

Note that in these charts, death rates had gone down by 90%+ long before the vaccine was ever introduced!   Note also that for those things for which there was no vaccines, the trend was virtually the same... so... do vaccines really save lives and "provide protection"... I think the jury is still very much out on that and that more and more are finding that vaccines are actually counter-productive... doing more damage than good!

The simple fact is that each year, the CDC must guess as to which 2 or 3 stains (of a possible 16,000+ strains) will "hit".   Given the "expertise" at the CDC, personally, I just don't believe they are competent enough to even begin to make the proper assessment on this issue.   For a whole lot more on that issue of "competence" and indeed, integrity, at the CDC, read "Book 3" posted on this website.   Before you believe what the CDC states on its website... take a look at what it says "behind closed doors" by going to Reports!

... and remember this critical... most revealing quote:

"Perhaps the most important thing that I took away from the last meeting was that those of us who deal with vaccines have really very little applicable background with metals and toxicological research."  [Dr. Martin Myers, Director of the National Vaccine Program Office, Department of Health and Human Services, National Vaccine Program Office Workshop on Aluminum In Vaccines, Caribe Hilton International Hotel, San Juan, Puerto Rico, May 11th - 12th, 2000, p. 1, transcripts provided by Eberlin Reporting Service, 14208 Piccadilly Road, Silver Spring, MD,  20906, (301) 460-8369), full transcript is posted under my Reports  link]. 

Personally, I have concerns about this vaccine having direct access to the brain via the olfactory system.   For that reason alone, I personally, would never take such a product - especially given I know that vaccine studies are usually no longer than 30 days and given viruses themselves are now very much linked to mental illness (more on that in "Book 3"!   Via the olfactory system, Flumist can bypass the blood brain barrier and give a "direct hit" to the brain... question is... are you willing to take "that direct shot to your brain"? especially since the olfactory bulb is but one of only two parts of the brain known to continue to develop new cells through most of a person's life (the other being the hippocampus - something very much "hit in Alzheimer's" ) and given it is believed these parts of the brain that continue to develop new cells may be where we get new stem cells for the brain... and keeping in mind that the sense of smell is tied to much more than "just smell"... it is tied to imagination, memory, sense of self, and a whole lot more in the human brain... For a whole lot more on these issues... again... read  "Book 3"!

Thanks, but... no thanks!

Return To HOME Page

Copyright 2002-2008 All materials I provide on this site including several key words and phrases are copyrighted materials.  All rights reserved.  Please see Use of Materials for more on this issue.  For general comments/questions, contact me at jbrohart@hotmail.com 

Things have a tendency to disappear on the Internet, but I can often find where the information has been moved or find replacement links addressing the same issue.  There is a lot of information provided on this site and any assistance with broken links is most appreciated.   My site has now been hacked twice.   If you get bounced to sites for online drugs, etc., report this to me at once using the above email as this is a result of hacking on my site.  This had nothing to do with me and/or my site.  Read more on hacking issue.

DISCLAIMER - The statements here mentioned and/or found in my materials have not been evaluated by the FDA or any other government agency or person in the medical field or in behavior therapy and are not meant to diagnose, cure, treat or prevent any illness/disorder and/or behavior.  This information is not intended as medical advice or to replace the care of a qualified healthcare physician or behavior therapist.  Always consult your medical doctor or behavior therapist.  All information provided by Jeanne A. Brohart on her website is for INFORMATION PURPOSES and to GENERATE DISCUSSION ONLY and should not be taken as medical advice or any other type of "advice".  Information put forth represents the EXTENSIVE RESEARCH and OPINIONS of a mother based on her experiences and research and provides information as it relates to one family's journey with autism in hopes that other families may benefit from this experience and/or research.  The creator of this site is not responsible for content on other sites.

DISCLAIMER - PART II - Now... for those of you who think "mother at home researching" means "uneducated person with unfounded information"... I have 10 years of university... 3 degrees... and over 30,000 hours of research into these areas.   For anyone who thinks my research is "unfounded"...  read the RESEARCH FILE posted on my home page... with its over 1,000 references ... for your reading pleasure... because... quite clearly... you haven't read it yet!    

Autismhelpforyou.com   Breaking The Code - Putting Pieces In Place!©